Here's an extremely important comment on a touching story in the Times today about a woman trying to save her dying father (it's from MGdoc of Oklahoma City):
There's an extremely strong cognitive disconnect running through this
story that the writer, Mr Andrey's daughter and most of the comments
fail to realize. Mr. Andrey was ALWAYS dying. 90 year old Alzheimers
patients falling from weakness and unable to care for themselves are
terminally ill. No amount of physical therapy, rehab, nursing home care
etc could change that. For this sort of patient, nursing homes are just
warehouses holding them until they complete the dying process. While
the bedsores, malnutrition etc alleged in the article are horrifying,
repeatedly taking a terminally ill patient to the hospital, repeatedly
treating sepsis, having emergency surgery for somebody who is about to
die despite surgery is a CHOICE. Both the patient and his daughter
wanted him to keep on living, but weren't willing to accept the
consequences of that decision. Mr. Andrey could have gone home, and
stayed home, and died at home. Instead, he kept going back to the
hospital, over and over. THAT's the real tragedy here; that he was
dying and a slow agonizing death was chosen instead of realizing that
death was inevitable and that death at home, without medical
intervention was an acceptable alternative.
2 comments:
i had an experience with a 19 year old cat. i gave him a chance but didn't want to torture him. obviously a human being is a very different matter.i think it is hard. it must be the wish of the patient i suppose.
You are so right. It is hard.
Post a Comment